I subscribe to NY Times Real Estate emails just for obnoxious gems like this. The rest of it reads just as one would expect.
Every once in a while, they publish articles in such amazing tone-deaf earnestness, about the world where a 19 year old student has a $3000 budget, which, tragically, is not enough to accommodate all his sewing machines and “design equipment”. But it all ends well because $3100 is the solution, and it is “not too much of a reach”, and issues such as hair accumulating in the bathtub, and dust collecting on books is not such a big deal.
Print publications are dying out, and of course there are niche publications like Du Jour (a pet project of some socialite, and it’s free), but why does “paper of record” that goes after mass market need to have this? We all know inequality in this city is ludicrous, is it the job of Times to rub it in?



